Linking Gay Marriage, Cup Cakes, and Time Magazine’s “Breast Wielding Mama”
Lynn | May 11, 2012 | Comments 6
The biggest news stories this week are about gay marriage, obesity and banning bake sales, and the Time story titled, “Are you Mom enough?”
How disturbing is the latest cover of Time magazine with a half-grown kid sucking breast milk while peering slyly at the photographer capturing the image for eternity?
All three stories have a common theme, enough is never enough. No matter what the topic or issue, humans always want to go just a little further, try to get just a bit more, establish lower lows, and lobby for greater freedom with tighter constraints. (I know, that sentence was contradictory – but accurate.)
Massachusetts is banning bake sales because parents can’t be trusted to make food choices for their children yet the Time cover story insists that breast feeding indefinitely is a great food choice. Do we see any hypocrisy with those competing arguments?
Highlights of Breast-Feeding and Attachment Parenting Problems
- This woman is “Mom enough” to use her son to build her blogging career. Pity the poor child when he’s fourteen, thirty-four, or sixty-four and still attached to Mama.
- Mama Jamie is front and center with this twisted image of parental attachment. Do the editors at Time and the “guru doctor” advancing this stuff really intend to equate parental attachment with physically locking on? Guess adoptive parents can rule out attachment as can mothers who cannot breast feed for other reasons. And guys, I guess this is one more nail in the coffin of the need for fathers.
- Since we’re on the subject of unsettling images of parental “attachment”, where is Dad in the story? Stay-at-home Mama has two kids and I did not find one reference to Dad in more than a dozen articles I pulled up before writing this post. How are children supposed to physically attach to Dad in this scenario?
- Supporters (just using that word in this context makes me cringe) insist that standing your kid on a chair to slurp breast milk for the world to see is a completely natural process. Right and Wrong. Nature intended for one offspring to nurse until the next comes along or until weaned. In situations where there is no food available a woman may nurse a child far longer than intended to keep it alive. If Jamie is “Mom enough” to expose her child to this notoriety why isn’t she mom enough to put proper food on the table? And again, where’s Dad?
- Breast milk loses its nutritive value after a while. By the time a kid is nearly four years old the milk supply is nothing more than a prop. (No pun intended.) And how many times has Mama said, “No breast for you unless you shape up young man!” Don’t send hate mail, I have personally witnessed the threat of withholding “attachment” by more than one mother speaking to an older child.
I had a friend who breast fed her kids until they went to kindergarten. She didn’t potty train them either. She figured once they were embarrassed in school they’d wean and potty train themselves. At least she didn’t ask anyone to watch. Oh yes, and after all that parental attachment Dad finally left. I don’t know what led to that divorce, I’m just still wondering where Mr. Mom Enough is hiding. Everything else is up front and center on the cover of Time.
. . .
Enter your email address in the right column to be notified of other Simple Truth – Simple Faith posts.
Share and Enjoy
Filed Under: Commentary and Opinion • Faith and Family












Time Magazine is responsible for putting the photo and the story into circulation. They are taking a disturbed woman and her innocent child who is already scarred for life and profiting from the truly sick interpretation of parenting. The fact that she is a model should have no bearing on Time’s decision to send this to press. When is the public going to stop accepting such behavior?
I don’t buy their magazine anyway, but everyone who subscribes should hit the company in its pocketbook and drop their subscription at once. And the magazine should be fined for their shameful behavior and exploiting the child.
You’re right, Marie. Time Magazine is responsible. And all the folks who support their decision make me wonder what the word wisdom really means in 2012. Thanks for sharing.
Gosh, where do I start? It’s been a crazy week – at least crazy if you have Jesus as your foundation. It troubles me that so many people find all this ‘stuff’ to be ‘natural’ or ‘mainstream.’ They’re swimming in a different stream than me. One thing I do to keep myself centered is the Jesus Prayer – “Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner.”
Dan
PS: I’m reading your second book and I just ran across your comment tht you have Reynaud’s Syndrome. My wife, Betty, has it too. That’s one reason we’re now living in New Mexico. It was diagnosed when we lived in Ohio and it was a big problem for her there.
When there are no absolutes (truth/lie, right/wrong) there is no wisdom. The most successful tool used to mess up folks is the mixture of 90% truth and 10% lie. Those who attempt to sway us to the side of error challenge us to condemn motherhood, love between consenting adults, or a desire to steer kids clear of unhealthy food. The rock that never moves and is the source of all absolutes is Christ. That is the only way to discern right from rhetoric.
And yes, one of the reasons we moved from Omaha to Arizona was the Raynauds. Still have issues now and then. Hope Betty keeps those hands and feet warm!
Blessings,
Lynn
The first thing that came to my mind when I saw this on TV a couple of nights ago was…”that is exactly what the Government has taught the public to do through the obama administration…Mom represents the Government and the little boy is the lazy people of this Nation that want the Government to take care of them and not to work for anything that they get”
Lisa, you nailed it. They’ll give us our boundaries and tell us what time to go to bed. In return we get to attach to the nanny government. (Had to watch how I said that…)